Abstract 436 Table 1

Studies comparing the effects of high flow oxygen vs. control on hospital stay, PICU admission, and intubation

1 st author, year, locationType of studyAge range of patientsWere the 2 groups comparable in severity?PICU admission or intubation in controlPICU admission or intubation in HFNCp-value for PICU/IntubationLOS in controlLOS in HFNCp-value LOSLimitation
Kepreotes, E. 2017. Newcastle, Australia. Randomised Controlled Yes 12/101 (12%)* 14/101 (14%) 0.41* 2 d 2 d 0.99 Excluded patients with with baseline oxygen saturation of<90%
Mayfield, S. 2014. Brisbane, Australia. Prospective with retrospective controls Yes 10/33 (31%)* 8/61 (13%) 0.043* 92 hours 92 hours 0.6 -Used retrospective controls
-Patients in control with O2 saturation of
Reise, J. 2017. Providence, Rhode Island. Retrospective Study No 12/936 (1.3%) 15/1001 (1.5%) 0.70 2 d 1 d 0.001 -Used retrospective controls before hospital-wide initiation of HFNC
-More severe disease in HFNC group based on billing codes
Milani, G. 2016. Milan,
Italy.
Prospective Yes 2/20 (10%)* 2/20 (10%) NS 9 d 6 d <0.005 2 patients in each group were transferred to PICU and excluded from analysis
  • *PICU admission Intubation only