Studies comparing the effects of high flow oxygen vs. control on hospital stay, PICU admission, and intubation
1 st author, year, location | Type of study | Age range of patients | Were the 2 groups comparable in severity? | PICU admission or intubation in control | PICU admission or intubation in HFNC | p-value for PICU/Intubation | LOS in control | LOS in HFNC | p-value LOS | Limitation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kepreotes, E. 2017. Newcastle, Australia. | Randomised Controlled | Yes | 12/101 (12%)* | 14/101 (14%) | 0.41* | 2 d | 2 d | 0.99 | Excluded patients with with baseline oxygen saturation of<90% | |
Mayfield, S. 2014. Brisbane, Australia. | Prospective with retrospective controls | Yes | 10/33 (31%)* | 8/61 (13%) | 0.043* | 92 hours | 92 hours | 0.6 | -Used retrospective controls -Patients in control with O2 saturation of | |
Reise, J. 2017. Providence, Rhode Island. | Retrospective Study | No | 12/936 (1.3%)† | 15/1001 (1.5%) | 0.70† | 2 d | 1 d | 0.001 | -Used retrospective controls before hospital-wide initiation of HFNC -More severe disease in HFNC group based on billing codes | |
Milani, G. 2016. Milan, Italy. | Prospective | Yes | 2/20 (10%)* | 2/20 (10%) | NS | 9 d | 6 d | <0.005 | 2 patients in each group were transferred to PICU and excluded from analysis |
*PICU admission †Intubation only