You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 68, Issue 5
  • Prevalence of the BRAF p.v600e variant in patients with colorectal cancer from Mexico and its estimated frequency in Latin American and Caribbean populations

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Original research
Prevalence of the BRAF p.v600e variant in patients with colorectal cancer from Mexico and its estimated frequency in Latin American and Caribbean populations
  1. Jesús Arturo Hernández-Sandoval1,
  2. Melva Gutiérrez-Angulo1,2,
  3. María Teresa Magaña-Torres3,
  4. Carlos Rogelio Alvizo-Rodríguez1,
  5. Helen Haydee Fernanda Ramírez-Plascencia1,
  6. Beatriz Armida Flores-López1,
  7. Jesús Alonso Valenzuela-Pérez4,
  8. Jorge Peregrina-Sandoval5,6,
  9. José Miguel Moreno-Ortiz1,
  10. Mev Domínguez-Valentín7,8,
  11. María de la Luz Ayala-Madrigal1
  1. 1 Instituto de Genética Humana "Dr. Enrique Corona Rivera" y Doctorado en Genética Humana, Departamento de Biología Molecular y Genómica, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
  2. 2 Departamento de Clínicas, CUALTOS, Universidad de Guadalajara, Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco, México
  3. 3 División de Genética, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Occidente, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
  4. 4 Servicio de Colon y Recto, Hospital Civil "Dr. Juan I. Menchaca", Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
  5. 5 Laboratorio de Inmunología, CUCBA, Universidad de Guadalajara, Zapopan, Jalisco, México
  6. 6 Laboratorio de Patología Clínica, Hospital Civil "Fray Antonio Alcalde", Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
  7. 7 Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  8. 8 Instituto de Investigación, Universidad Católica Los Angeles de Chimbote, Chimbote, Áncash, Perú
  1. Correspondence to Dr María de la Luz Ayala-Madrigal, Instituto de Genética Humana "Dr. Enrique Corona Rivera", Departamento de Biología Molecular y Genómica, CUCS, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, México; luz.ayala{at}academicos.udg.mx

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the frequency of the somatic BRAF p.V600E in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in Mexico and compare it with those estimated for Latin American and Caribbean populations. One hundred and one patients with CRC with AJCC stages ranging I–IV from Western Mexico were included, out of which 55% were male and 61% had AJCC stage III–IV, with a mean age of 60 years. PCR-Sanger sequencing was used to identify the BRAF p.V600E variant. In addition, a systematic literature search in PubMed/Medline database and Google of the 42 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean led to the collection of information on the BRAF p.V600E variant frequency of 17 population reports. To compare the BRAF variant prevalence among populations, a statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism V.6.0. We found that 4% of patients with CRC were heterozygous for the p.V600E variant. The χ2 test showed no significant difference (p>0.05) in p.V600E detection when comparing with other Latin American and Caribbean CRC populations, except for Chilean patients (p=0.02). Our observational study provides the first evidence on the frequency of BRAF p.V600E in patients with CRC from Western Mexico, which is 4%, but increases to 7.8% for all of Latin America and the Caribbean. The patient mean age and genetic descent on the observed frequencies of the variant in populations could influence the frequency differences.

  • colorectal neoplasms
  • carcinogenesis
  • adenocarcinoma
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, an indication of whether changes were made, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jim-2020-001301

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Significance of this study

    What is already known about this subject?

    • The BRAF p.V600E is an activating variant associated with several cancer types.

    • The reported prevalence of this pathogenic variant is 2.5%–20% in colorectal cancer.

    What are the new findings?

    • The BRAF p.V600E variant frequency in patients with colorectal cancer is 4% for Western Mexican, and 7.8% for Latin American and Caribbean populations.

    • Variations in patient mean age and genetic characteristics in Latin American and Caribbean populations could underlie the significant differences in BRAF p.V600E variant frequency.

    How might these results change the focus of research or clinical practice?

    • Determination of the BRAF p.V600E variant frequency in patients with colorectal cancer from Latin America and the Caribbean improves our understanding of the molecular characteristics of colorectal cancer, within this region, and provides an estimate of the need to increase molecular studies to support the treatment of the patient.

    Introduction

    Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common neoplasia worldwide. In Latin America and the Caribbean, accounting for Brazil, Argentina and Mexico, CRC is also the third most prevalent cancer among patients aged more than 50 years. Bray et al 1 estimated that the CRC incidence in Latin America and the Caribbean will increase by 44.6% by 2030, with almost 177,000 new cases and more than 94,000 deaths.

    To provide precision medicine for CRC treatment, the molecular variation present in tumors must be defined. Among the genetic changes encountered in CRC is the p.V600E pathogenic variant of the BRAF gene, which encodes a serine/threonine kinase involved in the EGFR–MAPK signaling pathway. This variant is a vital feature of this cancer as it causes constitutive activation of the protein, resulting in inhibition of apoptosis and uncontrolled cell proliferation.2

    The BRAF p.V600E variant (c.1799T>A, rs113488022, chr7:140 753 336 position in GRCh38.p12) causes a substitution of valine with glutamic acid at codon 600 (GTG→GAG).3 Besides the common allele with an A substitution, the occurrence of lower-frequency alleles with C and G substitutions make this pathogenic variant multiallelic.4 5 This variant represents approximately 90% of all BRAF variants detected in CRC, with a prevalence of 2.5%–20% in this disease associated with a reduced survival of patients with metastases.6 It is also often observed in other cancer types, such as 40%–60% of melanoma cases.7

    With the advent of the monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab, there has been improvement in the treatment of metastatic CRC, as these antibodies target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpressed in CRC. However, it has been shown that pathogenic variants of the BRAF gene interfere with the treatment response; therefore, analyzing the occurrence of this variant in primary CRC tumors will benefit clinical treatment.8 Our goal in this study was to determine the prevalence of BRAF p.V600E variant in patients with primary CRC from Western Mexico and compare the rate of occurrence with that in Latin American and Caribbean populations estimated based on a systematic review of a collection of studies. It might aid in improving treatment outcomes and encourage further research on the molecular traits of CRC within the area.

    Materials and methods

    Patients and tissue samples

    Primary tumor specimens from 101 Western Mexican patients with sporadic CRC were collected following surgical resection between September 2010 and July 2017 at the Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Dr. Juan I. Menchaca”, Jalisco, Mexico. At the time of resection, none of the patients had undergone radiation or chemotherapy. Fresh tissue of approximately 25–50 mg was removed from each tumor; diagnoses of colonic or rectal adenocarcinomas were confirmed by histopathology.

    BRAF p.V600E variant screening

    Subsequent to tissue acquisition, genomic DNA extraction was carried out with the High Pure PCR Template Preparation kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) followed by quantification (260/280 nm) using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The fragment of interest was amplified by PCR; the reaction volume was 25 µL, including 100 ng of DNA, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1× Taq buffer, 0.8 mM dNTPs, 0.08 U/µL Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and 0.1 mM of each primer (forward 5′-TCATAATGCTTGCTCTGATAGGA-3′’ and reverse 5′-TCCACTGATTAAATTTTTGGCC-3′). The amplified fragment length was 224 bp and the PCR conditions were initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C, annealing at 62°C, extension at 72°C, for 30 s per step, and finally elongation at 72°C for 10 min. To identify the p.V600E variant by Sanger sequencing, the BigDye Terminator V.3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and the Applied Biosystems ABI prism 310 Genetic Analyzer were used. The sequencing reaction conditions were initial denaturation at 96°C for 4 min followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 96°C for 10 s, annealing at 55°C for 5 s, extension at 60°C for 4 min, and finally elongation at 60°C for 7 min. To verify variant sequences, sequencing was duplicated. The reference BRAF gene sequence available on GenBank M95712.2 and Chromas software V.2.6.4 (Technelysium Pty Ltd, Australia) was used for interpreting sequencing results.

    Determination of BRAF p.V600E variant prevalence in Latin American and Caribbean populations

    A systematic search in the PubMed/Medline database using the keywords “frequency”, “BRAF”, “V600E”, “colorectal” and “cancer” led to 197 publications; however, only six were related to any of the 42 countries in Latin America and the Caribbean listed in the Latin American Network Information Center at the University of Texas.9 In addition, an exhaustive search on Google was performed, searching for each of the 42 countries by name, typed in Spanish and English, generating 769 entries that were reviewed individually. Only 17 publications related to sporadic CRC were identified. Among the selected publications, six reports had been previously identified on PubMed, 12 were articles, four were published abstracts with no complete population data but reported the BRAF p.V600E frequency, and one study was a postgraduate dissertation. From each study, we collected information on the BRAF p.V600E variant frequency, sex, mean and range of age of the study population, as well as pathological data, disease stage and tumor location.

    Statistical analysis

    The BRAF p.V600E variant frequency was estimated by quantification of the instances of its detection in Western Mexicans. A statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism V.6.0 to compare the BRAF variant prevalence between West Mexican to Latin American and the Caribbean populations. Statistical significance was defined as p value <0.05.

    Results

    Frequency of BRAF p.V600E variant in Western Mexican CRC population

    Table 1 displays the characteristics of the 101 CRC Western Mexican patients recruited in this study. Four subjects were found to be heterozygous for the BRAF p.V600E variant (figure 1): the neoplasms were always located in the right colon of patients aged 62–76 years, three of which were female. One tumor was poorly differentiated (stage III) and the rest were graded as moderately differentiated (two staged IV and one staged II). No statistical comparison between clinicopathological features of patients with or without the variant could be performed due to the low variant frequency.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC)

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Partial electropherogram of DNA from a patient with colorectal cancer from Western Mexico showing heterozygosity for the BRAF p.V600E variant.

    Frequency of BRAF p.V600E variant in Latin American and Caribbean CRC populations

    Of the 42 populations selected, reports on BRAF p.V600E prevalence were only found for Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Puerto Rico for a total of 17 publications. This pathogenic variant occurred in 0%–15% of the populations and, taken together, these data indicate that the BRAF p.V600E frequency for Latin America and the Caribbean equals 7.8% (117 positive findings out of 1492 analyzed patients). Table 2 illustrates the characteristics of the analyzed patients with CRC and the comparison of variant frequency between populations. Based on the criteria of Yamane et al 10 and to facilitate analysis, tumor localization described in the studies is specified as right colon for tumors reported in the cecum, the ascending and the transverse colon, and as left colon for tumors located in the descending colon, sigmoid colon and rectum.

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Comparison of the prevalence of the BRAF p.V600E variant among Latin American and Caribbean populations and description of the clinicopathological data of positive individuals

    Discussion

    The presence of the most common pathogenic variant of the BRAF gene, p.V600E, is associated with reduced effectiveness of CRC monoclonal antibody treatment that targets the EGFR–MAPK pathway.11 This invokes a clinical imperative to measure the prevalence of this variant in patients with CRC.

    Via a screening of 101 patients with CRC, we determined the prevalence of the variant to be 4% in Western Mexico. The four patients bearing the p.V600E variant were three women and a man, all older than 60 years, with tumors located in the proximal colon, three of which were at stages III–IV. Although no statistical approach was possible due to the low number of patients positive for the pathogenic variant, the characteristics of these subjects are in agreement with the clinicopathological features associated with BRAF p.V600E described in three meta-analyses.12–14 Chen et al 12 reported an analysis of 25 studies, published before 2013, and estimated a frequency of this pathogenic variant of 10.8% among 11,955 patients with CRC. Li and Li13 studied 13,208 patients with CRC from 25 selected study populations published after 2005 and estimated an average variant allele frequency of 11.1%. A recent meta-analysis of 61 studies published from 2006 to 2018 analyzing a total of 32,407 patients with CRC was reported by Wang et al,14 with a BRAF pathogenic variant frequency of 11.38%. Given the overlap period in the selected studies, several reports used in these meta-analyses are shared, leading to similar results regarding the increased frequency of BRAF p.V600E in female patients, patients older than 60 years, the proximal colon tumor location, the TNM III–IV stage, poor differentiation of the tumor and poor outcome of CRC. A comparison between the reported pathogenic variant frequencies of 10.8%, 11.1% and 11.38% showed no statistical differences, assuming a p=0.18, between the three meta-analyses, and the average estimate of the general frequency of BRAF p.V600E in patients with CRC is 11%.

    Since the three meta-analyses did not include studies on Latin American patients with CRC with the BRAF p.V600E, we conducted a search for publications with data from Latin American and Caribbean populations to compare the variant frequency. From the 17 selected reports, the estimated frequency ranged from 0% to 15% with sample sizes ranging from 36 to 120 patients. By comparing the selected populations, we only identified a significant difference in the frequency of BRAF p.V600E with one of the four Chilean populations included, the study of Wielandt et al, 15 with statistical significance (p=0.02). It must be noted that these authors described 53 patients who showed the highest variant frequency (15%) among the selected studies, with a median age of 70 years. The latter perhaps increases the possibility of detecting this pathogenic variant because, as previously described in the meta-analyses by Chen et al 12 and Wang et al,14 patient age above 60 years is associated with its presence.

    Differences in allele frequency could also be explained through the methodological approaches chosen in the studies. Colomba et al 16 and Roma et al 17 used Sanger sequencing for detection of the variant, which is characterized by 5%–30% lower sensitivity than RT-PCR, but 12% higher specificity. Colomba et al, 16 Lopez-Rios et al 18 and Jurkowska et al 19 suggested that differences in methodologies could alter p.V600E frequencies, principally for patients with melanoma, but it was also for patients with CRC, as described by Løes et al 20 and Roma et al. 17 However, the discrepancy between variant frequencies reported by Wielandt et al 15 and the present study is still unclear since detection of the variant allele was performed by Sanger sequencing in both studies. In fact, this approach was used in 56% of the selected studies in Latin America and the Caribbean.

    Differences in the variant prevalence among populations have also been attributed to race/ethnicity. Yoon et al 21 studied the variant frequency in patients with stage III colon cancer, showing that BRAF p.V600E was detected half as often in black (6.4%) and Asian (5.6%) patients as compared with white patients (13.9%). Heath et al 22 reported similar results for patients with CRC with 1.7% BRAF p.V600E occurrence in African-American patients compared with 8.5% positive cases of Caucasians. As described by Ruiz-Linares et al 23 and Belbin et al,24 the genetics of Latin American and Caribbean populations are an admixture of Native American, European and African characteristics. With respect to ancestries, Salazar-Flores et al 25 showed that the European ancestry is more prevalent in South America by contrast to Central America and Mexico, where the predominant ancestry is Native American. More specifically, this mixture of genetic traits produces differences based on geographical location and social structure of each country. Rubí-Castellanos et al 26 outlined the ancestry of Western Mexicans, showing that 53.2% are of Native American, 30.8% of European and 15.9% of African descent. Moreover, Santiago City in Chile, where the Wielandt et al 15 study population originated from, is within the central zone of Chile characterized by Eyheramendy et al,27 with 40.43% Native American ancestry, 2.46% African and 57.11% European ancestry, which is the highest percentage among Chilean populations. The genetic descent of patients with CRC from Western Mexico and Central Chile might be a crucial factor in producing the differences in frequency of BRAF p.V600E, which is further supported by the statistical discrepancy in the comparison of the whole variant frequency of 10.7%, considering the conclusive results for 28 of the 261 Central Chilean patients with CRC analyzed,15 28–30 in contrast to the 4% frequency estimated for Western Mexican patients with CRC (p=0.04). Whether advanced patient age or ethnicity contributed more to p.V600E frequency differences remains to be elucidated.

    Altogether, a total of 1738 patients with CRC were included in the Latin American and Caribbean studies, but only 1492 of them were analyzed for the BRAF p.V600E, with 117 (7.8%) positive results. This frequency is lower than the estimate of 11% deduced from meta-analytical reports.

    With respect to the CRC burden in Latin America and the Caribbean, GLOBOCAN estimates 6.7% of the worldwide CRC cases of patients older than 50 years to be registered in these areas.1 Although Carioli et al 31 observed a slight decrease in CRC cases in Latin America and the Caribbean in recent years, with the highest CRC rates accounted for in Argentina and the lowest in Mexico, Araghi et al 32 expressed that the CRC mortality rate in this region is expected to increase by 2035. Nevertheless, investigations on the molecular profile of CRC tumors, exploring the prevalence of BRAF p.V600E and other variants, on Latin American and Caribbean patients are limited due to several factors, including economical and health infrastructure, that discourage research efforts. The reduced number of patients analyzed for BRAF p.V600E presence was also identified as a limitation of the estimate produced in this study, although most of the selected Latin American and Caribbean populations studies showed statistical similarity in variant frequency, regardless of the number of cases per study.

    In conclusion, we found a 4% BRAF p.V600E prevalence among 101 CRC Western Mexican patients. This result was statistically similar to frequency estimates from studies in Latin America and the Caribbean, except of the variant prevalence in Chilean patients. As a whole, the BRAF p.V600E frequency in Latin America and the Caribbean was estimated to be 7.8%. Further research on the frequency of this pathogenic variant and on the molecular profile of CRC within the region will benefit treatment success and patient survival rates.

    Acknowledgments

    JAH-S, CRA-R, HHFR-P and BAF-L are students of the Doctorate in Human Genetics program and have a PhD scholarship from CONACyT. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

    References

    1. ↵
      2. Bray F ,
      3. Ferlay J ,
      4. Soerjomataram I , et al
      . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424.doi:10.3322/caac.21492
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. ↵
      2. Murcia O ,
      3. Juárez M ,
      4. Hernández-Illán E , et al
      . Serrated colorectal cancer: molecular classification, prognosis, and response to chemotherapy. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:3516–30.doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3516
      OpenUrl
    3. ↵
      2. Davies H ,
      3. Bignell GR ,
      4. Cox C , et al
      . Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 2002;417:949–54.doi:10.1038/nature00766
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      2. Thiel A ,
      3. Ristimäki A
      . Toward a molecular classification of colorectal cancer: the role of BRAF . Front Oncol 2013;3:281.doi:10.3389/fonc.2013.00281
    5. ↵
      2. Clarke CN ,
      3. Kopetz ES
      . BRAF mutant colorectal cancer as a distinct subset of colorectal cancer: clinical characteristics, clinical behavior, and response to targeted therapies. J Gastrointest Oncol 2015;6:660–7.doi:10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.077
      OpenUrl
    6. ↵
      2. Siraj AK ,
      3. Bu R ,
      4. Prabhakaran S , et al
      . A very low incidence of BRAF mutations in Middle Eastern colorectal carcinoma. Mol Cancer 2014;13:168.doi:10.1186/1476-4598-13-168
    7. ↵
      2. Lokhandwala PM ,
      3. Tseng L-H ,
      4. Rodriguez E , et al
      . Clinical mutational profiling and categorization of BRAF mutations in melanomas using next generation sequencing. BMC Cancer 2019;19:665.doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5864-1
    8. ↵
      2. Gong J ,
      3. Cho M ,
      4. Fakih M
      . RAS and BRAF in metastatic colorectal cancer management. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016;7:687–704.doi:10.21037/jgo.2016.06.12
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    9. ↵
      1. Latin American Network Information Center (LANIC)
      . Lozano Long Institute of Latin American studies (LLILAS) and Benson Latin American collection, University of Texas at Austin, 2019. Available: http://lanic.utexas.edu
    10. ↵
      2. Yamane LS ,
      3. Scapulatempo-Neto C ,
      4. Alvarenga L , et al
      . KRAS and BRAF mutations and MSI status in precursor lesions of colorectal cancer detected by colonoscopy. Oncol Rep 2014;32:1419–26.doi:10.3892/or.2014.3338
      OpenUrlPubMed
    11. ↵
      2. Lai E ,
      3. Pretta A ,
      4. Impera V , et al
      . BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer, a different breed evolving. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2018;18:499–512.doi:10.1080/14737159.2018.1470928
      OpenUrl
    12. ↵
      2. Chen D ,
      3. Huang J-F ,
      4. Liu K , et al
      . BRAFV600E mutation and its association with clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e90607.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090607
    13. ↵
      2. Li Y ,
      3. Li W
      . BRAF mutation is associated with poor clinicopathological outcomes in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2017;23:144–9.doi:10.4103/1319-3767.207712
      OpenUrl
    14. ↵
      2. Wang J ,
      3. Shen J ,
      4. Huang C , et al
      . Clinicopathological significance of BRAFV600E mutation in colorectal cancer: an updated meta-analysis. J Cancer 2019;10:2332–41.doi:10.7150/jca.30789
      OpenUrl
    15. ↵
      2. Wielandt AM ,
      3. Villarroel C ,
      4. Hurtado C , et al
      . Caracterización de pacientes Con cáncer colorrectal esporádico basado en La nueva subclasificación molecular de consenso. Rev Méd Chile 2017;145:419–30.doi:10.4067/S0034-98872017000400001
      OpenUrl
    16. ↵
      2. Colomba E ,
      3. Hélias-Rodzewicz Z ,
      4. Von Deimling A , et al
      . Detection of BRAF p.V600E mutations in melanomas: comparison of four methods argues for sequential use of immunohistochemistry and pyrosequencing. J Mol Diagn 2013;15:94–100.doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.09.001
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      2. Roma C ,
      3. Rachiglio AM ,
      4. Pasquale R , et al
      . BRAF V600E mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer: methods of detection and correlation with clinical and pathologic features. Cancer Biol Ther 2016;17:840–8.doi:10.1080/15384047.2016.1195048
      OpenUrl
    18. ↵
      2. Lopez-Rios F ,
      3. Angulo B ,
      4. Gomez B , et al
      . Comparison of testing methods for the detection of BRAF V600E mutations in malignant melanoma: pre-approval validation study of the companion diagnostic test for vemurafenib. PLoS One 2013;8:e53733.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053733
    19. ↵
      2. Jurkowska M ,
      3. Gos A ,
      4. Ptaszyński K , et al
      . Comparison between two widely used laboratory methods in BRAF V600 mutation detection in a large cohort of clinical samples of cutaneous melanoma metastases to the lymph nodes. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8:8487–93.
      OpenUrl
    20. ↵
      2. Løes IM ,
      3. Immervoll H ,
      4. Angelsen J-H , et al
      . Performance comparison of three BRAF V600E detection methods in malignant melanoma and colorectal cancer specimens. Tumour Biol 2015;36:1003–13.doi:10.1007/s13277-014-2711-5
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    21. ↵
      2. Yoon HH ,
      3. Shi Q ,
      4. Alberts SR , et al
      . Racial differences in BRAF/KRAS mutation rates and survival in stage III colon cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107:djv186.doi:10.1093/jnci/djv186
    22. ↵
      2. Heath EI ,
      3. Lynce F ,
      4. Xiu J , et al
      . Racial disparities in the molecular landscape of cancer. Anticancer Res 2018;38:2235–40.doi:10.21873/anticanres.12466
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      2. Ruiz-Linares A ,
      3. Adhikari K ,
      4. Acuña-Alonzo V , et al
      . Admixture in Latin America: geographic structure, phenotypic diversity and self-perception of ancestry based on 7,342 individuals. PLoS Genet 2014;10:e1004572.doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004572
    24. ↵
      2. Belbin GM ,
      3. Nieves-Colón MA ,
      4. Kenny EE , et al
      . Genetic diversity in populations across Latin America: implications for population and medical genetic studies. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2018;53:98–104.doi:10.1016/j.gde.2018.07.006
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    25. ↵
      2. Salazar-Flores J ,
      3. Zuñiga-Chiquette F ,
      4. Rubi-Castellanos R , et al
      . Admixture and genetic relationships of Mexican Mestizos regarding Latin American and Caribbean populations based on 13 CODIS-STRs. Homo 2015;66:44–59.doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2014.08.005
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    26. ↵
      2. Rubi-Castellanos R ,
      3. Martínez-Cortés G ,
      4. Muñoz-Valle JF , et al
      . Pre-Hispanic Mesoamerican demography approximates the present-day ancestry of Mestizos throughout the territory of Mexico. Am J Phys Anthropol 2009;139:284–94.doi:10.1002/ajpa.20980
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    27. ↵
      2. Eyheramendy S ,
      3. Martinez FI ,
      4. Manevy F , et al
      . Genetic structure characterization of Chileans reflects historical immigration patterns. Nat Commun 2015;6:6472.doi:10.1038/ncomms7472
    28. ↵
      2. Roa I ,
      3. Game A ,
      4. Bizama C , et al
      . Mutación del gen BRAF en pacientes con cánceres de colon y recto con KRAS no mutado. Rev méd Chile 2014;142:55–60.doi:10.4067/S0034-98872014000100009
      OpenUrlPubMed
    29. ↵
      2. Hurtado C ,
      3. Wielandt AM ,
      4. Zárate AJ , et al
      . Análisis molecular del cáncer de colon esporádico. Rev méd Chile 2015;143:310–9.doi:10.4067/S0034-98872015000300005
      OpenUrl
    30. ↵
      2. Alvarez K ,
      3. Orellana P ,
      4. Villarroel C , et al
      . EGFR pathway subgroups in Chilean colorectal cancer patients, detected by mutational and expression profiles, associated to different clinicopathological features. Tumour Biol 2017;39:101042831772451.doi:10.1177/1010428317724517
      OpenUrl
    31. ↵
      2. Carioli G ,
      3. Bertuccio P ,
      4. Malvezzi M , et al
      . Cancer mortality predictions for 2019 in Latin America. Int J Cancer 2019. doi:doi:10.1002/ijc.32749. [Epub ahead of print: 21 Oct 2019].
    32. ↵
      2. Araghi M ,
      3. Soerjomataram I ,
      4. Jenkins M , et al
      . Global trends in colorectal cancer mortality: projections to the year 2035. Int J Cancer 2019;144:2992–3000.doi:10.1002/ijc.32055
      OpenUrlPubMed
      2. Luévano-González A ,
      3. Guzmán AQ ,
      4. Ancer Rodríguez J , et al
      . Analysis of DNA mismatch repair proteins expression and BRAF V600E mutation in a subset of early- and late-onset colorectal carcinoma patients in Mexico. Arch Med Res 2011;42:457–62.doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.09.008
      OpenUrlPubMed
      2. González-Colunga KJ ,
      3. Lino-Silva LS ,
      4. Salcedo-Hernández RA , et al
      . BRAF V600E expression by immunohistochemistry in colon cancer and clinico-pathologic features associated with BRAF -mutated colonic cancers in Mexican patients. J Gastrointest Cancer 2020;51:35–40.doi:10.1007/s12029-018-00191-9
      OpenUrl
      2. Montenegro PC ,
      3. Egoavil C ,
      4. Casanova LA , et al
      . Molecular features of colorectal cancer in Peruvian patients. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:e14043.doi:10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.e14043
      2. Egoavil CM ,
      3. Montenegro P ,
      4. Soto JL , et al
      . Clinically important molecular features of Peruvian colorectal tumours: high prevalence of DNA mismatch repair deficiency and low incidence of KRAS mutations. Pathology 2011;43:228–33.doi:10.1097/PAT.0b013e3283437613
      OpenUrl
      2. Rasuck CG ,
      3. Leite SMO ,
      4. Komatsuzaki F , et al
      . Association between methylation in mismatch repair genes, V600E BRAF mutation and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer patients. Mol Biol Rep 2012;39:2553–60.doi:10.1007/s11033-011-1007-8
      OpenUrlPubMed
      2. Pereira-Zambalde E
      . Análise molecular da mutação BRAF V600E e da instabilidade de microssatélites em portadores de câncer de cólon e reto do sul do Brasil. Dissertação apresentada Coordenação do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética, Universidade federal do paraná, 2016.
      2. Dos Santos W ,
      3. Sobanski T ,
      4. de Carvalho AC , et al
      . Mutation profiling of cancer drivers in Brazilian colorectal cancer. Sci Rep 2019;9:13687.doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49611-1
      2. Perazzo F ,
      3. Denninghoff V ,
      4. Pasccon G , et al
      . Preliminary report of the mutation status of KRAS and BRAF-V600E in an Argentinian population of primary colorectal tumors [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:e22183.
      2. Lopez-Ruitti P ,
      3. Salanova R ,
      4. Nafissi J , et al
      . Mutational status of KRAS and BRAF of an Argentinian population of colorectal tumors [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:e14109.
      2. González ML ,
      3. Causada-Calo N ,
      4. Santino JP , et al
      . Universal determination of microsatellite instability using BAT26 as a single marker in an Argentine colorectal cancer cohort. Fam Cancer 2018;17:395–402.doi:10.1007/s10689-017-0052-4
      OpenUrl
      2. Perez Mayoral J ,
      3. Rivera-Lynch C ,
      4. Soto-Salgado M , et al
      . Description of molecular marker disparities and KRAS mutational spectrum of colorectal tumors from Puerto Rican Hispanics [abstract]. Cancer Res 2017;77:1759.
      2. Fleitas-Kanonnikoff T ,
      3. Martinez-Ciarpaglini C ,
      4. Ayala J , et al
      . Molecular profile in Paraguayan colorectal cancer patients, towards to a precision medicine strategy. Cancer Med 2019;8:3120–30.doi:10.1002/cam4.2191
      OpenUrl

    Footnotes

    • Contributors JAH-S, MG-A, JP-S, JMM-O, MTM-T and MdlLA-M contributed to the conception and design of the work and interpretation of data. They approved the final version. JAV-P provided the clinical data and samples from patients. JAH-S, CRA-R, HHFR-P and BAF-L processed the samples and acquired the data. MD-V revised the work critically and approved the final version.

    • Funding The PROSNI program of the Universidad de Guadalajara funded this study.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

    • Ethics approval Ethics committee of the Civil Hospital and Health Sciences University Center, University of Guadalajara, Mexico (register no. CI-01417).

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    • Data availability statement All data relevant to the study are included in the article.